Incentive-compatible Online Opinion Polls
نویسندگان
چکیده
The basic idea behind such information markets is that the pricing scheme of the market encourages the participants to buy or sell shares in accordance to their private information. Consider, for example, the security that pays $1 if the winner of the 2008 US presidential elections is democrat. An agent who privately believes with probability p that US will have a democrat president in 2008, will find it rational to buy more shares until the price reaches p. Numerous experiments and studies have shown that the price in such prediction markets converges to reflect the true information available in the market, despite game theoretic negative results (e.g., the “no trade” theorem). Moreover, prediction markets have been known to consistently outperforms other traditional prediction tools. However, one important shortcoming of prediction markets is that they must be linked to a publicly observable event that is precisely defined. This strong requirement can create problems even for the simplest prediction markets: for example, had Al Gore won the recount of votes following the 2000 US presidential election, the security associated with G.W. Bush would have still paid
منابع مشابه
When Opinion Request Meets Majority Search: Avoiding Fraud in On-line Review Systems
On-line review systems have been proved to be sensitive to fraud and have shown some shortcomings due to their reliance on using numerical ratings as reviews. For that reason, and supported by recent work on the field, we aim to address the problem of fraud in this type of systems, by designing a mechanism based on pairwise comparisons – encapsulated as opinion polls – coupled with an incentive...
متن کاملThe Role of Online Deliberation on Citizens’ Attitudes
In this paper, an experiment was conducted to assess the impact of online deliberation on citizens’ attitudes. Specifically, this research compared pre and post deliberation opinions of participants who deliberated online via an asynchronous platform regarding the issue of political opinion polls. Results indicate that online deliberation had a positive effect on citizens’ attitudes since it wa...
متن کاملVoter response to iterated poll information
We develop a formal model of opinion polls in elections and study how they influence the voting behaviour of the participating agents, and thereby election outcomes. This approach is particularly relevant to the study of collective decision making by means of voting in multiagent systems, where it is reasonable to assume that we can precisely model the amount of information available to agents ...
متن کاملIncentives for Answering Hypothetical Questions
Prediction markets and other reward mechanisms based on proper scoring rules can elicit accurate predictions about future events with public outcomes. However, many questions of public interest do not always have a clear answer. For example, facts such as the effects of raising or lowering interest rates can never be publicly verified, since only one option will be implemented. In this paper we...
متن کاملEmotional Reactions and the Pulse of Public Opinion: Measuring the Impact of Political Events on the Sentiment of Online Discussions
This paper analyses changes in public opinion by tracking political discussions in which people voluntarily engage online. Unlike polls or surveys, our approach does not elicit opinions but approximates what the public thinks by analysing the discussions in which they decide to take part. We measure the emotional content of online discussions in three dimensions (valence, arousal and dominance)...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007